The Complete Appeal: A practical civil appellate skills seminar (CA) (2011)

Includes comparisons between state and federal practice. Faculty includes sitting justices, staff attorneys, and some of the state's best appellate experts.

You may also be interested in:

Fed Court Boot Camp Conference (7th Annual)

Click here for more info.

“I appreciated the speakers from a variety of areas- law firm partners, staff attorneys, judges and law partners” – Deborah Bull, Esq. 

"Overall a very informative and helpful seminar."

"Helpful tips on what to include and how to formulate briefs."

"Great inside information & good practical delivery."

"Very on-point and strategic.  Excellent information.  Succinct!" - Anna Deckert, Esq.

"I liked the range of backgrounds - clerks, practitioners and justices." - Matthew Poelstra, Esq.

"Excellent help to an appellate practitioner." - Gary Bostwick, Esq.

"Very good; nice to hear about the inner workings of the Court of Appeal." - John Fagan, Duane Morris, LLP

"I thought the session was very informative and helpful." - Richard Rahm, Esq.

"Excellent seminar."


Dates and Times

To Be Announced


Course Summary

This intermediate level program will teach you sound strategies to improve your appellate practice, whether in state or federal court.  

Topics include: using the standard of review to your advantage, effectively briefing the appeal, appealability, writs v. appeals, stays, supersedeas, statements of decision, persuasive oral argument and handling a difficult bench at oral argument.

The panel focuses on civil appellate practice in California and the Federal Courts.

This seminar is an intermediate level course that will focus on expanding the participant's appellate practice knowledge and skills.  Participants hear the court’s perspective, as well as that of respected, experienced appellate attorneys and certified appellate specialists.

Special CA Supreme Court/USSC Session at SF program.  The last hour of the day in SF is focused on the CA Supreme Court and taught by staff attorneys and practitioners familiar with the court.

top of page

What You Will Learn if You Attend This Seminar

Each area of appellate practice below will be discussed in terms of the differences between how they are handled at the state appellate courts and how they are handled at the federal appellate courts. 

  • The Main Differences between State and Federal Appeals
  • Making and Preserving the Record at Trial
  • Staying Judgments and Orders
  • Writs, Motions and Other Procedural Headaches
  • More Effective Brief-Writing (discussion lead by justices)
  • Persuasive Oral Argument (discussion lead by justices)
  • Loose Ends Session: What to do after the appeal is over and other loose ends
  • State v Federal Differences: Main differences discussed
  • San Francisco Only: SPECIAL CA SUPREME COURT SESSION 
    • Petitioning for review, including use of amici
    • Opposing review
    • Likelihood of review; trends and statistics
    • Briefing on the merits
    • Oral argument before the Supreme Court
    • The Court’s decision-making process

Our Supreme Court Session in San Francisco got excellent reviews. Buy the Home Study now! 

top of page

Home Study Course

Purchase now »

The Complete Appeal: A practical civil appellate skills seminar (2011) - San Francisco

Click the green "Purchase Now" button to order the audio recording, "The Complete Appeal: A practical civil appellate skills seminar (CA) (2011)." This is a live recording of our 2011 San Francisco seminar.

This seminar is approved for 6.5 hours of MCLE credit in California.

$415 plus CA tax and $7.50 shipping.  


PDF Order Form

The Complete Appeal: A practical civil appellate skills seminar (2011) - Los Angeles

Click the green "Purchase Now" button to order the audio recording, "The Complete Appeal: A practical civil appellate skills seminar (CA) (2011)."  This is a live recording of our 2011 Los Angeles seminar. 

This seminar is approved for 6.5 hours of MCLE credit in California. 

$415 plus CA tax and $7.50 shipping. 


PDF Order Form

top of page

Agenda

Each area of appellate practice below will be discussed in terms of the differences between how they are handled at the state appellate courts and how they are handled at the federal appellate courts. 

Morning session: 9:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. 
  • State v Federal Differences: Main differences discussed 
  • Making and Preserving the Record at Trial
  • Staying Judgments and Orders 
  • Writs, Motions and Other Procedural Headaches 
 
Afternoon Session: 1:30 – 5:15 p.m.

Afternoon agenda fluctuates based on location.  There is a mock oral argument in Riverside, Orange County and Los Angeles.  There is a special session on the CA Supreme Court and USSC in San Francisco only. 
  • More Effective Brief-Writing (discussion lead by justices)
  • Persuasive Oral Argument (discussion lead by justices) 
  • Loose Ends Session: What to do after the appeal is over and other loose ends 
San Francisco Only: SPECIAL CA SUPREME COURT SESSION

The last segment of the day in San Francisco will include a discussion regarding practice before the California Supreme Court:

  • Petitioning for review, including use of amici
  • Opposing review
  • Likelihood of review; trends and statistics
  • Briefing on the merits
  • Oral argument before the Supreme Court
  • The Court’s decision-making process   

Our Supreme Court Session in San Francisco got excellent reviews. Buy the Home Study now!

top of page

CLE Specialization Credit

Pincus Professional Education certifies that this seminar has been approved for 6.5 hours of Appellate Specialization Certification credit in California.

top of page

MCLE Credit

Pincus Professional Education certifies that this seminar has been approved for 6.5 hours of MCLE credit in California, including .5 hour ethics credit.

Pincus Professional Education certifies that this seminar has been approved for 6.0 hours of MCLE credit in Washington and Illinois.

Upon request, we will assist attorneys in asking for CLE credit in other states.

top of page

Instructors

Faculty:

Honey Kessler Amado, Esq.
Certified Specialist: Appellate Law

Honey Kessler Amado is a certified appellate law specialist, certified by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization, and has been so since 1997. In addition to representing clients in the review courts, Ms. Amado serves as a consultant in the trial court on issues or cases anticipated for appeal, reviews cases to advise on the merits for appeal, and assists with writing and editing complex memoranda of points and authorities and briefs.

Ms. Amado currently sits on the Appellate Courts Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, serves on the County Bar’s State Appellate Judicial Evaluations Committee, and serves on the voluntary settlement and mediation panel of the California Court of Appeal, Second District. She sat on the Child Support Advisory Board of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors until it was disbanded in December 2009. For a number of years, she sat on the Editorial Board of Los Angeles Lawyer magazine, having served as Chair of the Editorial Board for the 2000-2001 term. She enjoys an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell and is honored to have been named as a Super Lawyer of Southern California in appellate law since 2005.

Ms. Amado has authored a number of articles on legal issues relating to appellate law or family law, including co-authoring a chapter on Hague procedures in the United States in international custody disputes for an international treatise and an article on calculating the time to appeal in state court. She is a frequent speaker and panelist on various law-related issues, having presented at a number of local study groups, bar associations, the Los Angeles County Bar Association, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, the California State Bar, and the American Bar Association.

Ms. Amado has a number of published opinions, including: Kristine H. v. Superior Court (Lisa R.) (2005) 37 Cal.4th 156; Marriage of Feldman (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1470; Marriage of Abargil (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 1294; Marriage of Brewer and Federici (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 1334; People v. De Leon (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1265; and Posey v. Leavitt (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1236, 280 Cal.Rptr. 568.

Randee J. Barak, Esq.
Lead Appellate Attorney
California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven

Randee Barak has been a Senior Appellate Attorney at the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District since 1999.  Prior to coming to the Court of Appeal, Ms. Barak specialized in business and health care litigation for Sidley Austin, working in both its Litigation and Appellate Practice groups.  Ms. Barak graduated with honors from UCLA School of Law in 1992 and, following graduation, served as law clerk to the Honorable Judge Arthur Alarcon on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  A member of the Los Angeles County Bar Appellate Courts Committee, she is the co-chair of the “Appellate Court Experience program (ACE),” a program developed in conjunction with the Constitutional Rights Foundation to educate Los Angeles County area high school students about the appellate court system.  In 2008 the Constitutional Rights Foundation honored Ms. Barak as “Lawyer of the Year for the Public Sector.”  She is the author of several articles on litigation and appellate practice. 

Daniel H. Bromberg, Esq.
Partner
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP
Instructor Portrait

Mr. Bromberg is an experienced appellate advocate who has argued before the United States Supreme Court as well as numerous federal and state appellate courts.  With more than a decade’s experience in the Supreme Court, Mr. Bromberg is familiar with all aspects of Supreme Court practice, including merits briefing, petitions for certiorari, and amicus briefs.  He also is experienced with practice in federal appeals courts and California appellate practice, including writ petitions, requests for depublication, and petitions for review.  

Mr. Bromberg’s practice focuses upon intellectual property, commercial disputes, constitutional law, and other complex legal matters at both the trial and appellate levels.  He has been involved in many of the patent cases before the Supreme Court in recent years, filing amicus briefs on behalf of high tech companies in both the eBay and KSR cases.  He also has litigated several groundbreaking copyright cases and is currently litigating appeals involving patents, trademarks, antitrust, and punitive damages.  

Gina M. Calvelli, Esq.
Senior Appellate Court Attorney
California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four

Gina M. Calvelli has been a Senior Appellate Court Attorney at the Second District Court of Appeal since 2001.  She formerly worked for Associate Justice Richard M. Mosk in Division Five, and currently works for Associate Justice Thomas L. Willhite, Jr. in Division Four.

Before coming to the Court of Appeal, Ms. Calvelli was a partner at Riordan & McKinzie, where she specialized in Appellate Law.  She began her practice at Khourie, Crew & Jaeger, a San Francisco litigation firm specializing in antitrust, intellectual property, and consumer class actions.  Ms. Calvelli is a 1991 graduate of Stanford Law School.

Carin T. Fujisaki, Esq.
Judicial Staff Attorney
California Supreme Court
Instructor Portrait

Carin Fujisaki has been an appellate attorney with the California Supreme Court since 1990.  She spent her first year on the court’s civil central staff handling petitions for review, and has since served as a judicial staff attorney for Associate Justice Marvin R. Baxter.  Prior to joining the court, Ms. Fujisaki worked as a litigation associate with the San Francisco law firm of Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson & Falk.

Ms. Fujisaki received her J.D. in 1985 from U.C. Hastings College of the Law, where she was an associate editor of the Hastings Law Journal.  In 2003, Governor Gray Davis appointed her to the Board of Directors of U.C. Hastings, where she currently serves as vice chair of the Board and is an active member of several other special committees.

Wendy C. Lascher, Esq.
Partner/State Bar Certified Specialist in Appellate Law
Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP
Instructor Portrait

Wendy Lascher, a State Bar Certified Specialist in Appellate Law and AV-rated attorney, handles civil and criminal appeals in state and federal courts. She also assists trial lawyers with formulating strategy and crafting motions.  Before joining FCOP, Wendy spent 37 years with Lascher & Lascher and has argued appeals in the U.S. Supreme Court, the California Supreme Court, the U.S. Seventh and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals, all six districts of the California Court of Appeal and in U.S. District Courts. 

Active in the appellate legal community, Wendy is a member and past president of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers and currently serves as President of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers.  She has also served as chair of the State Bar’s Committee on Appellate Courts, chair of the Appellate Law Advisory Commission of the Board of Legal Specialization and President of the Ventura County Bar Association. 

In her spare time, Wendy teaches at the Ventura and Santa Barbara Colleges of Law, is a mentor in the Big Brothers, Big Sisters program and enjoys hiking, gardening and working out.  Wendy has three sons and two granddaughters.

Ms. Lascher graduated from Stanford University in 1970 and from the University of Michigan Law School in 1973.  Among her landmark cases are In re Marriage of Pendleton and Fireman (2000) 24 Cal.4th 39, the first California case to hold spouses may waive spousal support in a properly drafted prenuptial agreement; Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara (1994) 7 Cal.4th 725; clarifying appealability of judgments on separately tried issues; Sanchez v. Hillerich & Bradsby (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 703, holding that where the manufacture of a baseball bat increases the game’s inherent risk, a player does not as a matter of law assume the risk of being hit by a batted ball; Rich v. Thatcher (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1176,holding that grandparent seeking visitation against wishes of fit parent has the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence that denial of would be detrimental to the grandchild;  and Theiler v. Ventura County Community College District (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 852, clarifying the method to determine full-time teaching hours under Education Code §87482.5.  Ms. Lascher has taught appellate law at the Santa Barbara and Ventura Colleges of Law.  She is a past president of the Ventura County Bar Association, and has been editor of its magazine, CITATIONS, for several years.

Amy E. Margolin, Esq.

Bien & Summers LLP

Amy Margolin practices at Bien & Summers, a civil appellate boutique headquartered in Marin County.    

Ms. Margolin has more than ten years of experience in civil appellate litigation, representing clients on appeal in a wide range of disputes, including complex commercial litigation, bankruptcy matters, business torts, family law, employment matters, trade secret disputes, arbitration issues, and constitutional litigation.  

She has successfully argued cases in the California Court of Appeal and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, including before an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit.  Before joining Bien & Summers, Ms. Margolin was a director in the Appellate Practice Group of Howard Rice Canady Falk & Rabkin in San Francisco. She is a graduate of Harvard College and Stanford Law School, lectures frequently in the area of appellate practice, and since 2007 has been recognized in the annual “Super Lawyers” survey of Law & Politics as among the top five percent of lawyers practicing in Northern California in the area of civil appeals.

Paula M. Mitchell, Esq.
Career Law Clerk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Paula Mitchell has participated in the review and disposition of hundreds appeals filed in the Third, Fourth, Sixth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits as a career law clerk for Senior Judge Arthur L. Alarcón on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.  She has briefed and presented appeals, including recommended dispositions, to three-judge Ninth Circuit merits panels.  As a former BAP law clerk to Judge Erithe Smith on the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Paula also has extensive experience reviewing and deciding  bankruptcy appeals.     

Prior to her clerkship, Paula practiced in major law firms in New York and Los Angeles, focusing on high-stakes litigation and appeals in both federal and state courts.  Her legal experience began when she worked on the Amoco Cadiz oil spill appeal in the Seventh Circuit on behalf of the Republic of France.  Paula was also part of the team responsible for obtaining a $5 billion punitive damages verdict against Exxon in the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Litigation, an award partially vacated by the Ninth Circuit in  In re Exxon Valdez, 270 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001).

As an adjunct professor of law at Loyola Law School, Paula teaches Habeas Corpus & Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation.  She and Judge Alarcón co-authored the recently published article, "Executing the Will of the Voters?:  A Roadmap to Mend or End the California Legislature’s Multi-Billion Dollar Death Penalty Debacle," 44 Loy. L. Rev. S41 (2011), which has received wide coverage in the press.  Paula has been instrumental in the founding of the Alarcón Advocacy Center at Loyola Law School, dedicated to providing exciting clinical legal education programs to students.

She is a graduate of Loyola Law School, received an M.A. in international history from The London School of Economics and Political Science, and a B.A. from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.  She is a member of the state bar in California, New York, the District of Columbia, and is admitted to practice before the Fourth, Sixth, Ninth and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court. Paula is a member of the Appellate Courts Committee of the L.A. County Bar Association.
 

Tara Mitcheltree, Esq.
Former Law Clerk for Sr. Judge Arthur L. Alarcon
The Hahn Legal Group

Ms. Mitcheltree has worked in law firms in Los Angeles and New York, focusing on high-stakes and international litigation and appeals, in both federal and state courts.  As a former law clerk for Judge Alarcón, she participated in the appellate review of numerous civil and criminal matters pending before the Third, Fourth, Sixth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits.  The civil appeals involved a variety of issues, including violations of Title VII, federal preemption, immigration, and habeas corpus.  The criminal appeals involved such issues as sentencing, violations of the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution, and tax evasion.

In addition to researching legal issues and standards of review, drafting memoranda and proposed dispositions and discussing recommendations with the judges on the appellate panels, Ms. Mitcheltree oversaw all administrative aspects of processing the cases on calendars, including handling motions and supplemental filings for the cases, assessing whether cases should be submitted without oral argument, and monitoring petitions for  rehearing by the panel or rehearing en banc.

Ms. Mitcheltree is a graduate of Brooklyn Law School in Brooklyn, New York (J.D. 2002), and Mount Holyoke College in South Hadley, Massachusetts (B.A. 1996). She is admitted to practice in California, New York, before the District Court for the Central District of California, and the Fourth, Sixth, Ninth and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeals.
 

T. Peter Pierce, Esq.
Certified Appellate Specialist
Richards, Watson & Gershon
Instructor Portrait

T. Peter Pierce is a shareholder in the Litigation Department at Richards, Watson & Gershon in Los Angeles, where he specializes in representing public agencies in disputes involving land use, zoning, environmental, and constitutional issues, among others. 

Mr. Pierce is certified as a specialist in appellate law by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.  He recently was appointed to a three-year term (2011-2014) on the State Bar’s Appellate Law Advisory Commission.  He is the Immediate Past Chair of the State Bar Committee on Appellate Courts, a committee on which he has served since 2006.  Mr. Pierce is honored by his recent selection as a Super Lawyer in appellate law (2009-2011). 

Mr. Pierce has participated as a panelist in numerous appellate law and writ programs, and has written several articles focusing on appellate law issues.  He served as an adjunct professor from 2006-2009 at USC Law School, where he taught a civil litigation course to second and third-year students.

After graduating with honors from the Tulane University School of Law in 1992, Mr. Pierce served as a law clerk to the Honorable Marcel Livaudais, Jr., Judge of the United States District Court in New Orleans.

Kelley B. Poleynard, Esq
Professor of Lawyering Skills
Whittier Law School

Professor Poleynard teaches legal writing, professional skills, and pre-trial litigation to first year and upper division students at Whittier Law School. Before joining the faculty, Professor Poleynard practiced law in Los Angeles, focusing on high stakes litigation and appeals before state and federal courts in a variety of cases, such as, business, real estate, and employment matters. Among other things, as a practitioner she has written and handled several writs and motions before the California appellate court. Professor Poleynard clerked for United States District Judge Audrey B. Collins in the Central District of California (1997-1998). As a law clerk, she assisted with the Court’s law and motion calendar and trials, which involved an assortment of legal issues, including, violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VII, and the ADEA, intellectual property, First Amendment, state immunity and toxic torts. Professor Poleynard is a graduate of the University of Southern California, Gould School of Law (J.D., order of the coif, 1997) where she was a production editor for the Southern California Review of Law & Women’s Studies, and the University of California, Los Angeles (B.A. 1992). She is admitted to practice in California and before the District Court for the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.

Hon. Stuart R. Pollak
Justice
California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three

Justice Pollak has been an Associate Justice in the First District of the California Court of Appeal since 2002.

Justice Pollak has spoken at several of Pincus Professional Education's Appellate seminars in the past. Relevant to the Pincus Pro Ed 2013 SLAPPs seminar, Justice Pollak has two published decisions involving SLAPP issues including: Birkner v. Lam (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 275, and Vivian v. Labucherie (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th267.

Prior to becoming an Associate Justice, Mr. Pollak was a Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court for twenty years. Prior to joining the court, he was a partner at Howard, Rice Nemerovski, Canady & Pollak for fourteen years. Before joining Howard Rice, Justice Pollak served on the President's Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and was Special Assistant to the Assistant Attorney General from 1963 to 1965.

Justice Pollak received his LL.B. from Harvard Law School in 1962, Magna Cum Laude.

Hon. James A. Richman
Justice
California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two

Justice Richman was born and raised in San Francisco. He attended Saint Ignatius High School, the University of San Francisco, and its School of Law. He received his J.D in 1965, graduating first in the class, and was president of the McAuliffe Law Honor Society.

Following law school Justice Richman clerked for the Honorable Raymond L. Sullivan on the First District Court of Appeal, and then served a year as Assistant Professor at Gonzaga University School of Law. In June 1967, he joined the law firm now known as Cooley Godward LLP, where he became a partner in 1972, and where he practiced law until appointed to the Alameda County Superior Court in 1996. Justice Richman served on the Superior Court for nine years, in both criminal and civil assignments, the last seven years in the law and motion department. He was appointed to the Court of Appeal in February 2006.

Justice Richman's practice at Cooley Godward was general commercial litigation, with emphasis on probate and trust litigation, primarily for charitable or non-profit institutions. His clients included the American Heart Association, the American Cancer Society, Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children, and Guide Dogs for the Blind; he also represented the University of San Francisco and the Pacific School of Religion. Justice Richman also handled insurance coverage and related issues for business clients of the firm, and was the lead attorney on over 40 cases in the California and federal appellate courts.

From 1972 to 1997, Justice Richman taught as an Adjunct Professor at the University of San Francisco School of Law, where he taught Evidence, Torts, and Civil Procedure Before Trial; he also served on the faculty in 2000 as a Distinguished Visiting Professor. He has also taught at numerous legal education programs, teaching both lawyers and judges. Before his appointment to the court, Justice Richman was involved in many bar associations and legal professional societies, and is currently a member of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers and the Earl Warren American Inn of Court.

Hon. Laurence D. Rubin
Associate Justice
California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight
Instructor Portrait

Associate Justice Laurence D. Rubin began his career as a Law Clerk to the Honorable Stanley Mosk in 1971. Justice Rubin became Vice President of the CA Judges Association in 1996 and has served in the CA Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, Division 8 since 2001.

Justice Rubin served as a Municipal Court Judge from 1982 to 2000 and a Superior Court Judge from 2000 to 2001. He also served as a Justice Pro Tem in the CA Court of Appeal between 1985 and 2000.

Justice Rubin is a faculty member at The CA Center for Judicial Education and Research, teaching courses on judicial ethics and technology since 1992. He has been a member of the Judicial Council of CA, Trial Court Coordination Advisory Committee and State Constitutional Amendment 4 Working Group. He served on the Board of Directors for the CA Judges Foundation and the CA Judges Association, and currently serves as a Judge in the Trial Advocacy Program at The UCLA School of Law.

Justice Rubin earned his J.D. from The UCLA School of Law in 1971, where he earned the Academic Achievement Award from the UCLA Alumni Association.

Hon. Ethan P. Schulman
Judge
San Francisco Superior Court
Instructor Portrait

Ethan P. Schulman is a partner in the San Francisco office of Crowell & Moring and is a member of the firm’s Litigation Group.  Mr. Schulman’s practice focuses on appeals, writs, and complex litigation, with an emphasis on constitutional and public law, class actions, and representation of law firms and lawyers.  Mr. Schulman is certified as a specialist in appellate law by the Board of Legal Specialization of the State Bar of California, and is a member of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers.  He has been selected as a Northern California Super Lawyer each year since 2004.  Mr. Schulman recently was named a recipient of the 2011 California Lawyer Attorney of the Year Award and of the Hispanic Bar Association’s Guardián de Justicia (Guardian of Justice) Award for his work on Martinez v. Regents of the University of California, 50 Cal. 4th 1277 (2010), which resulted in a unanimous ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a state law that allows undocumented immigrant students to pay lower in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities.  He is a graduate of Princeton University and of the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law.

Benjamin G. Shatz, Esq.
Partner & Appellate Practice Group Co-Chair
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Instructor Portrait

Mr. Shatz is a California State Bar Certified Appellate Specialist. 

Mr. Shatz is Co-Chair of Manatt’s Appellate Practice Group. He has briefed hundreds of civil appeals, writs and petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Courts of Appeals, California Supreme Court and California Courts of Appeal, covering areas of law including entertainment, copyright, trademark, employment, land use, banking, insurance, product liability, professional liability, wrongful death, punitive damages, class actions, anti-SLAPP and unfair competition.

Before joining Manatt, Mr. Shatz was in the appellate department of an international law firm. He also served as law clerk to The Honorable Robert J. Johnston, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nevada, and as extern to The Honorable Dorothy W. Nelson, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He is a frequent lecturer and author, having been published in California Litigation, California Lawyer, Los Angeles Lawyer, Inside Counsel, The Daily Journal, The Recorder, For the Defense, California Defender, CEB Civil Litigator Reporter, and many other legal publications.

John A. Taylor, Jr., Esq.
Partner/Certified Appellate Specialist
Horvitz & Levy LLP
Instructor Portrait

John Taylor is a partner at Horvitz & Levy, where he has been practicing since 1993.  He is a California State Bar Certified Appellate Specialist and is admitted to practice in the California and Utah state courts, the United States Supreme Court, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Mr. Taylor has been lead appellate counsel in dozens of appeals in a wide variety of areas (his name currently appears on over 25 published opinions and many more unpublished opinions), including matters involving the right of publicity, the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), breach of contract, insurance coverage, employment discrimination, CERCLA preemption, personal injury, California’s “lemon law,” and trusts and estates.

Mr. Taylor has participated in numerous cases before the California Supreme Court, and in 2009 was lead attorney in obtaining a closely watched decision overturning a $15 million judgment against a coffee manufacturer for the unauthorized use of the plaintiff’s photograph on the label of its coffee jar. In addition, he has authored amicus curiae briefs in the California Supreme Court on issues such as the scope and application of Proposition 64’s amendments to the UCL; public policy issues arising out of subcontractor indemnity provisions in residential construction contracts; the constitutionality of Proposition 5, the Indian gaming initiative; and the validity of the Seaman's tort.

In 2007, Mr. Taylor was appointed by Chief Justice Ronald George to serve on the Judicial Council Appellate Advisory Committee of California, as one of the three private civil attorneys on the committee. In 2009, he was named to the Top 100 list of leading lawyers in California by the Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal. He is “AV Preeminent” rated by Martindale Hubbell, and has also been listed as a Super Lawyer and as a “Best Lawyer” by The Best Lawyers in America every year since 2006.  In 1994, Mr. Taylor was honored as the “Outstanding Young Lawyer” of the year by the Los Angeles Chapter of the J. Reuben Clark Law Society.

Mr. Taylor received his Bachelor of Arts from Brigham Young University (summa cum laude) and his Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School (magna cum laude). Following law school, he held a judicial clerkship with the Hon. Patrick E. Higginbotham, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Before joining Horvitz & Levy, Mr. Taylor was a litigation associate with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

Todd E. Thompson, Esq.
Career Judicial Staff Attorney
First District Court of Appeal, San Francisco

Todd E. Thompson has been a Judicial Staff Attorney in the First District of the California Court of Appeal since 2003.  He currently works in the chambers of the Honorable Sandra L. Margulies.

Prior to joining the court, Mr. Thompson was a litigation partner at Howard, Rice Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin for eighteen years.  While at Howard, Rice, he had a broad commercial civil practice, with particular emphasis on land use and intellectual property law.  Although Mr. Thompson’s practice at Howard Rice was primarily in the trial court, he litigated a significant number of appeals, including two appeals challenging the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, Holmes v. California National Guard, 90 Cal. App. 4th 297 (2001) and Holmes v. California Army National Guard, 124 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 1998), and cases in the Federal Circuit, such as Elekta Instrument S.A. v. O.U.R. Scientific International, Inc., 214 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2000).  Prior to joining Howard Rice, Mr. Thompson served from 1983 to 1985 as a law clerk to the Honorable Charles S. Haight, Jr., in the US District Court, Southern District of New York.

Mr. Thompson is currently serving as a member of the State Bar’s Judicial Nominee Evaluation Commission and is admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  He received his J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 1983, Order of the Coif.  He also holds a M.S. in Agronomy from Cornell University and a B.A. in Environmental Science from the University of Santa Barbara.

Hon. Paul Turner
Presiding Justice
California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five
Instructor Portrait

Presiding Justice Paul Turner was appointed to the Los Angeles Municipal Court at the age of 35. In 1984, he was challenged for his seat on the municipal court in the primary election. He won the June primary election after securing endorsements from virtually every side of the political spectrum and retained his seat with 67.18 percent of the vote. In 1984 and 1985, he was appointed by Governor George Deukmejian to serve as the judicial representative to the Intergovernmental Advisory Council on Alcohol, Drugs, and Traffic Safety. On March 1, 1985, at the age of 38, he was appointed to the Los Angeles Superior Court. While on that court, he was the first judge to serve in the night court project where felony cases were tried during the late afternoon and evening as part of an effort to reduce county jail crowding. Later, after serving one year as a law and motion civil judge, he was 1 of 25 civil judges assigned to the trial court delay reduction project. This program assigned civil cases to judges and gave them the responsibility of insuring that the lawsuits were promptly resolved. At the commencement of the program, civil cases were routinely taking five years to resolve. In then Judge Turner's court, virtually all new cases were resolved within one year rather than the normal five years that it had previously taken.

Justice Turner was appointed to Division Five of the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District by Governor George Deukmejian; he was confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments as an Associate Justice and took office on November 2, 1989. He was elevated to the position of Presiding Justice and after confirmation by the Commission on Judicial Appointments and took office on January 6, 1991. For six years Justice Turner served as the Assistant Administrative Presiding Justice and as a Presiding Justice has sat by assignment on the California Supreme Court on seven occasions. He is currently a member of the Second Appellate District Executive Committee. He is a member of the California Judge's Association and has served on that group's civil law and procedure, criminal law, and election committees. On four separate occasions, he has been assigned by the California Supreme Court to act as a Special Master in hearings ordered by the Commission on Judicial Performance

Prior to taking his judicial appointment, Justice Turner was a litigator in private practice, where he litigated both criminal and civil cases in federal and state courts. He also represented principally criminal defendants in several hundred appeals. He represented the defendant in the case of People v. Barraza in which the California Supreme Court changed the test for entrapment in California courts. He also represented the California Retailers Association and former State Senator Newton Russell in the case of In re Deborah C. where the California Supreme Court held that Miranda warnings need not be given by store security guards.

Gary A. Watt, Esq.
Partner
Archer Norris
Instructor Portrait

Gary A. Watt is a partner with Archer Norris and a State Bar approved, certified appellate specialist. In addition to writs and appeals, he is also retained for summary judgment and post-trial motions, etc. He is director and supervising attorney for U.C. Hastings’ 9th Circuit clinical program, The Hastings Appellate Project, and chair of the Contra Costa County Bar Association’s appellate practice section. He can be reached at gwatt@archernorris.com and his blog posts found at www.caappellatelaw.com.

 

 

Kelly White, Esq.
Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of General Counsel
Social Security Administration

Ms. White has practiced in major law firms in Los Angeles and San Francisco, focusing on high-stakes civil and white collar criminal litigation and appeals in federal and state courts.  She has also served as a Staff Attorney in the Motions Unit for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.  As a Staff Attorney in the the Motions Unit, Ms. White managed a caseload of over 150 civil, criminal, and immigration appeals and presented motions during monthly calendars and on emergency bases to two- and three-judge panels.  Her diverse caseload included matters involving employment, bankruptcy, civil, agency, contract, regulatory, immigration, criminal and state law. 

Ms. White has also clerked for United States District Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  As a law clerk for Judge Alarcon, she participated in the appellate review of matters pending before the Third, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits. 

Ms. White has guest lectured at Loyola Law School regarding Habeas Corpus and Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation, and authored "What Have you Done With My Lawyer?: The Grand Jury Witness's Right To Consult With Counsel," 32 LOY.LA.L. REV. 907 (1999).  

Ms. White is a graduate of Whittier College and Loyola Law School, Los Angeles (J.D., maga cum laude, 1999) where she was Editor in Chief of the Loyola Law Review (1998-1999).  She is admitted to practice in California and before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.

Greg E. Wolff, Esq.
Career Judicial Attorney/Senior Research Attorney
California Supreme Court

A seasoned career court attorney, Greg Wolff has been a judicial attorney in both the Court of Appeal in Los Angeles and at the California Supreme Court for more than twenty years.  He currently serves as a senior research attorney for an appellate court in the California court system.  As Supervisor of the Appellate Section of the Criminal Branch of the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, and in the Appellate Section of the Civil Branch, Mr. Wolff has briefed and argued over 350 appeals and 100 writ proceedings.  He has been an Adjunct Professor at UC Hastings College of the Law since 2000, where he teaches Moot Court and Legal Writing & Research.  In 1977, Mr. Wolff received his J.D. from Southwestern University School of Law, where he was an editor of the law review.

top of page

What attendees have said about this seminar:

"Very practical information that is extremely useful in my day to day practice."

"Gave a nice overview of appeals - I enjoyed it."

"Appreciated insight into research clerks' procedure."

"I appreciated [the faculty's] straight forward approach."

"Nice job by all of the panelists."

"Great inside information & good practical delivery."

"[The speaker provided] very insightful and applicable comments helpful to practitioners."

"Great program! Experienced panel with great practical information."

"Excellent distillation of what matters in appellate practice."

"Clear, concise, and informative!"

"Very helpful and relevant information!"

"Excellent! Exactly what I wanted to learn!"

"Excellent speaker - great advice, practical, informative!"

"Very informative! Packed full of useful information."

"Entertaining and very informative!"

"Great practical perspective!"

top of page

Terms & Policies

Seminar, Webinar, Webcast Registration and Attendance Terms & Policies

Reminder: The room temperature at hotels and other seminar locations are notoriously hard to control. Please bring a sweater or jacket in case it gets cold and/or layer as if you are going to the movies so you are comfortable.

Recording policy: No audio or video recording of any program is permitted.

Seminar Cancellations: Should you be unable to attend for any reason, please inform us in writing no later than 14 days prior to the event and a credit voucher will be issued. If you prefer, a refund, less a $50 non-refundable deposit, will be issued. No refunds or credits will be given for cancellations received within 14 days of an event.

Substitutions may be made at any time.

Webinars, Tele-seminars and Webcast Cancellations: Once log-in codes and passwords are issued for a webinar, tele-seminars or webcasts, a refund is not possible. If for any reason you cannot attend the event after you have received the codes, we will automatically convert your registration to an instant streaming/instant download or CD format and provide you with the information you need to access the recording after the program concludes and the recording is available.

Return/Refund Policy for Tapes/CDs/DVDs:

Tapes, CDs and DVDs are returnable for a full refund or replacement if defective, within 90 days of purchase.

top of page

For news and information about upcoming seminars

View our Seminars page.

top of page

Featured Charity

We have all seen the sad story in the news about a neglectful dog owner who goes into a store "just for a minute" and returns to find his dog dead inside the car, where, on hot days, interior temperatures can reach over 160 degrees in just ten minutes. In happier endings, the police arrive to smash the car window to rescue the dog in time. Please consider buying and using this sun shade to spread the word to keep dogs (and other pets) safe on hot days. For only $20.00 you could save an animal's life. It's a bargain.



 

Subscribe for CLE Announcements